Informational Effects of Regulation FD: Evidence from Rating Agencies
ثبت نشده
چکیده
This paper studies changes in the information environment brought about by Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD), which was implemented on October 23, 2000. FD now prohibits U.S. public companies from making selective, non-public disclosures to favored analysts and portfolio managers. FD, however, has a number of exclusions, one of which still allows disclosure of nonpublic information to credit rating agencies. As a result, rating agencies now have access to confidential information that is not made available to equity analysts any more. This can potentially increase the value of credit ratings to equity investors. We examine a sample of credit rating changes and their effect on the company’s stock price. We find that the informational effect of downgrades and upgrades is much bigger in the post-FD period. Apparently, FD conferred a strategic advantage to the agencies.
منابع مشابه
Re-examining the Effects of Regulation Fair Disclosure Using Foreign Listed Firms to Control for Concurrent Shocks
We re-examine the effects of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) using ADRs (who are exempt from Reg FD) to control for confounding events which affected all traded firms. Tests based on public information metrics (returns volatility, informational efficiency and trading volume) and on analyst information metrics (forecast dispersion and accuracy) suggest that Reg FD did not uniquely affect the...
متن کاملAvoiding the Rating Bounce: Why Rating Agencies Are Slow to React to New Information
Rating agencies state that they take a rating action only when it is unlikely to be reversed shortly afterwards. Based on a formal representation of the rating process, I show that such a policy provides a good explanation for the empirical evidence: Rating changes occur relatively seldom, exhibit serial dependence, and lag changes in the issuers’ default risk. In terms of informational losses,...
متن کاملThe Valuation Effects of Bank Loan Ratings in the Presence of Multiple Monitors
Studies have shown that when two information providers or outside auditors exist, the value provided by the second one will be decreased by the actions of the first. Capitalizing on the highly similar functions performed by banks and rating agencies, this paper examines the informational value of the credit ratings of bank loans. Further, it provides evidence on whether rating agencies duplicat...
متن کاملInformational Efficiency of Credit Default Swap and Stock Markets: the Impact of Credit Rating Announcements
Informational Efficiency of Credit Default Swap and Stock Markets: The Impact of Credit Rating Announcements This Paper analyses the response of stock and credit default swap (CDS) markets to rating announcements by the three major rating agencies during 2000-2. Applying event study methodology, we examine whether and how strongly these markets respond to rating announcements in terms of abnorm...
متن کاملDifferences of opinion and selection bias in the credit rating industry
Many regulations use private sector credit ratings to determine investment prohibitions and capital requirements for institutional portfolio investments. These regulations implicitly assume that different agencies have equivalent rating scales, despite the fact that some agencies assign systematically higher ratings than others. We assess the appropriateness of these regulatory practices by tes...
متن کامل